|
|
|
|
|
home > country pages > montenegro
Montenegro

freedom of information | news | links | measuring openness




Text from the freedominfo.org Global Survey: Freedom of Information and Access to Government Records Around the World, by David Banisar (updated July 2006)

There is no general right of freedom of information in the Constitution.(1) Article 35 provides for freedom of the press. Article 19 gives everyone a right to "timely and complete information" about the environment. Article 31 gives individuals a right to access personal information about themselves and prevent its abuse.

Serbia & Montenegro:
Basic Facts

• Life expectancy at birth (years), 2000-05: 73.2

• Adult literacy rate (% ages 15 and above), 2003: 96.4
• Combined gross enrolment ratio for primary, secondary and tertiary schools, 2002/03: 74.4
• GDP per capita (PPP US$) (HDI), 2003: N/A
• Total population (millions), 2003: 11
• Total fertility rate (births per woman), 2000-05: 1.7
• Under-five mortality rate (per 1,000 live births), 2003: 11
• Net primary enrolment ratio (%), 2002/03: 96.9
• HIV prevalence (% ages 15-49), 2003: 0.2 [0.1 - 0.4]
• Undernourished people (% of total population), 2000/03: 11
• Population with sustainable access to an improved water source (%), 2002: N/A
Source: UN Development Program, Human Development Reports Data

The Law on Free Access to Information was adopted in November 2005 and went into effect then.

The law allows any natural or legal person the right to access information held in any form by state and local authorities, public companies and other entities that perform public powers. Requests must be in writing, including via email. Bodies must decide within eight days which can be extended another 15 days. It cases of emergencies, responses must be within 48 hours.

There are exemptions for national security, defense or international relations; public security, commercial or other private or public economic benefits; economic monetary or foreign exchange policy; prevention and investigation of criminal matters; personal privacy and other personal rights; and internal negotiations. The interests must be "significantly harmed" and the harm must be "considerably bigger than the public interest in publishing such information". Information cannot be withheld if it relates to ignoring regulations, unauthorized use of public resources, misuse of power, criminal offenses and other related maladministration issues.

Appeals for denials are to the supervisory body of the agency. Appeals can then be made to a court.

Government bodies are also required to create and publish lists of types of information held including public registers and records. The media ministry must publish a guide.

There are sanctions for agencies and officials who fail to allow access to information, publish the guide or punish whistleblowers.

The law also includes a limited whistleblower protection provision that limits sanctions on public employees who publicly reveal misuse or irregularities and who also inform the head of the agency or relevant investigatory agency.

The Ministry of Culture and Media is in charge of implementation and has conducted some trainings of officials but the perception by NGOs is that there is little political will on the law. The Network for the Affirmation of NGO Sector (MANS) has filed several hundred requests so far and report that the agencies responded back on time in around 50 percent of the cases.

There is currently no data protection act in Montenegro. The government has established a working group on data protection to develop a bill to send to Parliament in 2006.

There is no law on the classification of state secrets but a working group is developing a bill to legislate on it this year. The Agency for National Security has issued a decree on classification but refuses to release it. The Criminal Code prohibits the disclosure of Official Secrets and Military Secrets.(2) The Law on the Agency for National Security allows individuals to ask for their files but thus far, it says no one has asked for them.

Back to top


25 NOVEMBER 2002
MONTENEGRO: Government Initiates Bill on Freedom of Information
An excerpt from a report by Montenegrin Mina News Agency published by BBC Worldwide Monitoring indicates that the Montenegrin government, Information Secretariat, Interior and Justice Ministries and representatives from the NGO sector have signed a joint initiative on a freedom of information bill.

The aim of the initiative is to increase accountability of the government and honor the citizens' right to be informed and participate in all the processes initiated by the government on their behalf. The parties have agreed to have a first draft of the Bill by the end of December 2002.

 

Notes

1. Constitution of the Republic of Montenegro. http://www.venice.coe.int/docs/2005/CDL(2005)096-e.pdf

2. Criminal Code §§ 425, 471.

 

 

Back to top

ORGANIZATIONS

Foundation Open Society Institute, Representative Office Montenegro

OTHER RESOURCES

OSCE Mission to Serbia & Montenegro, "Press Release: OSCE Mission acknowledges adoption of Montenegrin Law on Free Access to Information and encourages its implementation" (11 November 2005)

Article 19, Memorandum on the Proposal for the Adoption of the Law on Free Access to Information of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (October 2004)

Article 19, Letter to Prime Minister of the Republic of Montenegro- support FOIA initiative (8 June 2004)

Art. 19, Memorandum on the Draft Law on Free Access to Information of Montenegro (March 2004)

Analysis of the Montenegrin draft Access to Information Law with regard to the provisions of the Public Information Law and the international Standards for the freedom of information, Constantine Palicarsky (AIP-Bulgaria)

[serbia & montenegro]

Freedom House, Freedom in the World 2005
(On scale of 1-7, with 1 representing the highest level of freedom and 7, the lowest)

Political Rights: 3
Civil Liberties: 2
Status: Free

Freedom House, Nations in Transit 2005
(The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level and 7 the lowest level of democratic development. The 2005 ratings reflect the period January 1 through December 31, 2004)

Electoral Process: 3.25
Civil Society: 2.75
Independent Media: 3.25
Governance: N/A
National Democratic Governance: 4.00
Local Democratic Governance: 3.75
Judicial Framework and Independence: 4.25
Corruption: 5.00

"In Serbia, the most important development in 2004 was that the new government stopped harassing and interfering with the editorial practices of private media. This improvement ended the government's custom of applying informal pressure on editors, a policy that had lingered even after the state of emergency was lifted in 2003. This change affected the majority of print and electronic media, which are privately owned. In 2004, the Serbian government maintained control of public media, notably television, which has high public influence. In November, the Parliament adopted the Law on Public Accessibility to Information and appointed a commissioner to disclose information about government work that is of public relevance. However, the law remains unclear about what information is relevant and who decides that question. Additionally, the appointed commissioner was not provided an office, so in practice there is no place where one can submit a request."

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices 2004
(U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor)

"On November 2, the National Assembly passed the Law on Free Access to Information of Public Importance. The Law provides for access to information of "legitimate public importance" (with many exceptions) and establishes an independent Commissioner for Information of Public Importance, selected by the National Assembly, to handle appeals when Government agencies reject requests for information. At year's end, the Law was in the early stages of implementation. Transparency International's efforts to get information using the new Law have had poor results."

World Bank, Governance Matters IV: New Data, New Challenges
By Daniel Kaufmann, Aart Kraay, and Massimo Mastruzzi

1) Voice and Accountability: 0.12
2) Political Instability and Violence: -0.97
3) Government Effectiveness: -0.21
4) Regulatory Burden: -0.72
5) Rule of Law: -0.72
6) Control of Corruption: -0.48

Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Index 2005
(Relates to perceptions of the degree of corruption as seen by business people and country analysts and ranges between 10 - highly clean and 0 - highly corrupt).

CPI Score: 2.8

 


|
|
|
|
|
|
Suite 701, Gelman Library, 2130 H Street, NW, Washington, D.C., 20037 - email@freedominfo.org
Copyright © 2006 freedominfo.org