There
is no specific right of access to information in the 1982
Turkish Constitution. Article 26 gives right of free expression
including the right to receive information. Article 74 provides
for a right of petition and Article 125 provides for judicial
review and compensation of administrative decisions.
•
Combined gross enrolment ratio for primary,
secondary and tertiary schools, 2002/03: 68.4
•
GDP per capita (PPP US$) (HDI), 2003: 6,772
•
Total population (millions), 2003: 71
•
Total fertility rate (births per woman), 2000-05:
2.5
•
Under-five mortality rate (per 1,000 live births),
2003: 39
•
Net primary enrolment ratio (%), 2002/03: 86
•
HIV prevalence (% ages 15-49), 2003: <0.1
[<0.2]
•
Undernourished people (% of total population),
2000/03: 3
•
Population with sustainable access to an improved
water source (%), 2002: 93
Source:
UN Development Program, Human Development Reports
Data
The
Law on Right to Information was adopted unanimously by the
Parliament in October 2003 and went into effect in April
2004.
Citizens
and legal persons have a right to information from public
institutions and private organizations that qualify as public
institutions. Non-citizens and foreign corporations based
in Turkey also have a right to information related to them
or their interests if the country they are from allows Turkish
citizens to demand information from their authorities. Requests
are to be made in writing or in electronic form if the identity
of the applicant and their signature can be verified using
a digital signature.
Government
bodies are required to respond in 15 working days. They
must provide either a certified copy of the document or
when it is not possible to make a copy, requestors can examine
them at the institution. Oral requests are to be treated
"with hospitality and kindness" and immediately
reviewed and resolved if possible.
There
are exemptions for state secrets which would clearly cause
harm to the security of the state or foreign affairs or
national defense and national security; would harm the economic
interests of the state or cause unfair competition or enrichment;
the duties and activities of the civil and military intelligence
units; administrative investigations; judicial investigations
or prosecutions; violate the private life or economic or
professional interests of an individual; privacy of communications;
trade secrets; intellectual property; internal regulations;
internal opinions, information notes and recommendations
if determined by the institution to be exempt; and requests
for recommendations and opinions. Information relating to
administrative decisions that are not subject to judicial
review or which affect the working life and professional
honour of an individual are still subject to access. Other
legal regulations which withhold information are overridden
by the law.
There
is no internal appeals mechanism. Appeals of withholdings
are to the Board of Review of the Access to Information.
Its jurisdiction was originally limited to cases relating
to national security and state economic interests but the
law was amended in November 2005 to allow appeals in all
cases. Prior to the amendment, the Board still heard cases
relating to the other issues. It can set up commissions
and working groups and invite government representatives
and outside organizations to participate. Its secretariat
is handed by the Prime Ministry. The Board received 1566
appeals through March 2006. It accepted 567 cases.
Appeals
can then be made to the administrative court. There are
a few pending cases mostly related to non-compliance with
board decisions by public authorities but there have been
no decisions.
Sanctions
can be imposed under the criminal law and administratively
against officials for negligently, recklessly or deliberately
obstructing the application of the law.
Institutions
must prepare reports on the application of the law and submit
them to the Board of Review. The Board must produce an annual
report to submit to the National Assembly which will be
made public. As of June 2005, there had been 395,557 requests,
87 percent of which the information was given fully. It
was only partially given in 13,300 cases and denied in full
in 20,000 cases.
An
initial review of implementation made in October 2004 by
NGO BilgilenmeHakki.org found that the major ministries
had made serious efforts to implement the law. All had set
up their FOI units and were taking requests through Internet
portals. Over 75 percent of requests were being provided
in full, some ministries such as Justice and Trade and Industry
replying in the same day. However four ministries had not
responded to requests.
A
review by BilgilenmeHakki.org in 2004 and 2005 of municipalities
and governorships found that few local authorities websites
were following the rules while the governorships were somewhat
better but still were failing a significant number of times.
The
government published drafts of bills on "State Secrecy"
and "Trade Secrets" in February 2004. It is expected
that the draft bill on "State Secrecy" will codify
the existing practice of allowing officials to classify
documents with little oversight or restrictions. The bills
have not been adopted yet. The Criminal Code prohibits the
unauthorized disclosure, obtaining, or publishing state
secrets, including of another country. Penalties include
jail time up to ten years. Obtaining or publication of "banned
documents" (non-public official documents) is also
prohibited.
A
draft data protection bill was also produced by the Ministry
of Justice during 2003. It has also not advanced.
[Footnotes
for this section are currently unavailable but will be posted
the week of July 10. All footnotes and references are also
available in the full study, available
here.]
24
OCTOBER 2003
TURKEY: Turkey Approves Right to Information Law
According to the Turkish
Daily Zaman, President Ahmet Necdet Sezer has approved
Turkish 'Right to Information' law.
In
terms of the law, citizens will now have access to information
regarding activities of civil and military intelligence
units. Partial information can be obtained about the Supreme
Military Council (YAS), the Presidency, and the Judges and
Prosecutors High Council (HSYK), which are not subject to
inspection.
The
Right to Information law was presented for the Presidency's
approval on October 10, 2003 after being passed in parliament.
9
OCTOBER 2003
TURKEY: Freedom Of Information Law Enacted
The Turkish government enacted the Right to Information
Law (Law No: 4982). The Law was initially prepared by the
Ministry of Justice and was introduced to the Parliament
on 25 June, 2003.
237
Turkish MPs out of a total of 550 were present for the final
voting on the Right to Information Bill and all of the present
MPs (including those from the opposition) voted for in favor
of making Access to Information a right for Turkish citizens.
The
new law itself does not say anything on implementation and
there will be further regulations published within the next
six months clarifying issues related to implementation.
29
AUGUST 2003
TURKEY: Access to Information Bill to be Debated in Parliament Turkishpress.com
reports on the progress of an Access to Information Bill
in turkey. The current ‘right to know’ bill
is one of most important legal arrangements towards democratization,
since it stipulates that any person genuinely needing information
from the state will have access to it, which will make democracy
both more participatory and meaningful.
The
bill was first presented to the Parliament at the end of
June. The relevant parliamentary commissions have discussed
the measure and prepared their reports on it. Therefore,
the next step for the bill is debate in the full Parliament.
Providing
the right to access state information will promote openness
and transparency in the state and ensure the effective participation
of citizens in the administration. Under the bill, any person
wanting access to state information may apply to the competent
authority responsible for providing it. However, the bill
contains certain exceptions: information the disclosure
of which could endanger the security, integrity or sovereignty
of the nation or state; confidential communications between
state officials; information whose disclosure would harm
the ability of the government to manage the economy; information
which would reveal personal information concerning another
person; information including trade secrets; or information
whose disclosure would harm public safety or public order,
etc.
11
JULY 2003
TURKEY: Parliament to Tackle Draft Law to Limit State Secrets The
Turkish Daily News reports that the government has presented
Parliament a draft law limiting the scope of state secrets
and enabling citizens the right to obtain information about
state works.
Arranging procedures regarding the usage of the right to
obtain information, which is the requisite of a democratic
and transparent administration, the bill stipulates that
public institutions are to provide information about their
works to citizens upon written demand.
According to the bill, citizens will apply to public institutions
from which they want to obtain information with a petition.
The public institutions will have to provide information
or document within 15 days upon demand.
These
institutions will then be required to clarify their reason
if they reject the applications of citizens. The citizens,
on the other hand, will be able to raise an objection with
the Information Obtaining Evaluation Board within 15 days
after their demand is refused. The board will give a decision
on the application in 60 days.
Notes
[Footnotes
for this section are currently unavailable but will be posted
the week of July 10. All footnotes and references are also
available in the full study, available
here.]
Accountability
and Public Voice: 4.35
Civil Liberties: 3.98
Rule of Law: 4.18
Anticorruption and Transparency: 3.43
"A
law on freedom of information went into effect
in April 2004, but implementation has been slow.
Civil servants remain reluctant to provide governmental
information, in part due to vague provisions in
the law exempting state and trade secrets, although
some reportedly will respond to bribes."
"In
October 2003, the Government adopted the Freedom
of Information Law, under which citizens could
apply to government institutions for information.
The HRF maintained that the law gives the Government
broad leeway to reject applications on national
security and other grounds; HRF requests for information
during the year were denied, and there was no
opportunity to appeal. The Press Council reported
that it received no complaints during the year
from journalists making applications under the
law."
Civil Society, Public Information
and Media (rating 1-100):
75 (Moderate)
Subcategory: Access to Information
Law (rating 1-100):
71 (Moderate)
"A
final point pertains to citizens' rights to obtain
information from public entities. Despite a recently
passed law guaranteeing that right, there is great
resistance from lower-level bureaucrats to providing
any kind of information to ordinary citizens.
The state bureaucracy simply does not have an
institutional culture that is favorable to such
requests. Nevertheless, in at least some cases
small "tips" or "gifts" can
facilitate things."
1)
Voice and Accountability: -0.15
2) Political Instability and Violence: -0.60
3) Government Effectiveness: 0.01
4) Regulatory Burden: -0.07
5) Rule of Law: 0.04
6) Control of Corruption: -0.23