about | countries | foi news | features | ifti | links
stay informed!
Join freedominfo.org's
email update list


home > features > secrecy and openness in the european union > appendix 1

30 SEPTEMBER 2002
CASE STUDY: Secrecy and Openness in the European Union
The Ongoing Struggle for Freedom of Information
By Tony Bunyan, Statewatch

Appendix 1: The 1993 Council code

Council decision (20.12.93) on public access to Council documents

Table of Contents

Summary

Acknowledgements

Introduction

Chapter 1: The 1993 Decision on access to EU documents

Chapter 2: The Decision tested: The Guardian case

Chapter 3: The Decision tested: The Statewatch cases

Chapter 4: The Decision tested: The Swedish journalists union case

Chapter 5: The Amsterdam Treaty and the run-up to the Regulation

Chapter 6: The "Solana Decision"

Chapter 7: The battle over the new Regulation

Chapter 8: The new Regulation, its implementation and new challenges

Appendices:

Appendix 1: The 1993 Council code

Appendix 2: New Regulation on access to EU documents came into operation on 3 December 2001

Appendix 3: Useful addresses and websites

Appendix 4: Select bibliography


THE COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 151 (3) thereof,

Having regard to its Rules and Procedure, and in particular Article 22 thereof,

Whereas on 6 December 1993 the Council and the Commission approved a code of conduct concerning public access to Council and Commission documents, reaching common agreement on the principles which must govern such access;

Whereas provisions should be adopted for the implementation of those principles by the Council;

Whereas these provisions are applicable to any document held by the Council, whatever its medium, excluding documents written by a person, body or institution outside the Council;

Whereas the principles of allowing the public wide access to Council documents, as part of greater transparency in the Council's work, must however be subject to exceptions, particularly as regards protection of the public interest, the individual and privacy;

Whereas, in the interests of rationalization and efficiency, the Secretary-General of the Council should sign on behalf of the Council and on its authorization replies to applications for access to documents, except in cases where the Council is called upon to reply to confirmatory application;

Whereas this Decision must apply with due regard for provisions governing the protection of classified information,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

1.The public shall have access to Council documents under the conditions laid down in this Decision.

2."Council document" means any written text, whatever its medium, containing existing data and held by the Council, subject to Article 2 (2).

Article 2

1. An application for access to a Council document shall be sent in writing to the Council. It must be made in a sufficiently precise manner and must contain information enabling the document or documents requested to be identified. Where necessary, the applicant shall be asked for further details.

2.Where the requested document was written by a natural or legal person, a Member State, another Community institution or body, or any other national or international body, the application must not be sent to the Council, but direct to the author.

Article 3

1.The applicant shall have access to a Council document either by consulting it on the spot or by having a copy sent at his own expense. The fee shall be set by the Secretary-General.

2.The relevant departments of the General Secretariat shall endeavour to find a fair solution to deal with repeat applications and/or those which relate to very large documents.

3. Anyone given access to a Council document may not reproduce or circulate the document for commercial purposes through direct sale without prior authorization from the Secretary General.

Article 4

1. Access to a Council document shall not be granted where its disclosure could undermine:

- the protection of the public interest (public security, international relations, monetary stability, court proceedings, inspections and investigations),

- the protection of the individual and of privacy,

- the protection of commercial and industrial secrecy,

- the protection of the Community's financial interests,

- the protection of confidentiality as requested by the natural or legal person who supplied any of the information contained in the document or as required by the legislation of the Member State which supplied any of that information.

2. Access to a Council document may be refused in order to protect the confidentiality of the Council's proceedings.

Article 5

The Secretary-General shall reply on behalf of the Council to applications for access to Council documents, except in the cases referred to in Article 7 (3), in which the reply shall come from the Council.

Article 6

Any application for access to a Council document shall be examined by the relevant departments of the General Secretariat, which shall suggest what action is to be taken on it.

Article 7

1. The applicant shall be informed in writing within a month by the relevant departments of the General Secretariat either that his application has been approved or that the intention is to reject it. In the latter case the applicant shall also be informed of the reasons for this intention and that he has one month to make a confirmatory application for that position to be reconsidered, failing which he will be deemed to have withdrawn his original application.

2. Failure to reply to an application within a month of submission shall be equivalent to a refusal, except where the applicant makes a confirmatory application, as referred to above, within the following month.

3. Any decision to reject a confirmatory application, which shall be taken within a month of submission of such application, shall state the grounds on which it is based. The applicant shall be notified of the decision in writing as soon as possible and at the same time informed of the content of Articles 138e and 173 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, relating respectively to the conditions for referral to the Ombudsman by natural persons and review by the Court of justice of the legality of Council acts.

4. Failure to reply within a month of submission of the confirmatory application shall be equivalent to a refusal.

Article 8

This Decision shall apply with due regard for provisions governing the protection of classified information.

Article 9

This Decision shall be reviewed after two years of operation. In 1995 the Secretary-General shall submit a report on the implementation of this Decision in 1994 and 1995, in preparation for that review.

Article 10

This Decision shall take effect on 1 January 1994.

 

Back to top


FEATURES ARCHIVE

30 JANUARY 2008
JAPAN - Tokyo Court: Foreign Ministry's Failure to Provide Documents on 1965 Japan-Korea Normalization Pact Illegal

9 MAY 2007
China Adopts First Nationwide Open Government Information Regulations

28 SEPTEMBER 2006
International Right to Know Day 2006 - Celebrating Freedom of Information Around the World

12 JULY 2006
REPORT: UNDP Seminar Spotlights Complexity of Expanding Right to Know

27 JUNE 2006     
CASE STUDY: Two Steps Forward, One Step Backwards: The Access to Information Campaign in Argentina

22 MARCH 2006     
Freedom of Information Laws Added to the Development Agenda

22 MARCH 2006
freedominfo.org Kicks Off Legislative Transparency Project

16 NOVEMBER 2005
ANALYSIS: How to Measure Openness?
Towards an International Index

28 SEPTEMBER 2005
Freedom of Information Makes Headlines Around the World
International Right to Know Day 2005

9 MAY 2005
REPORT: Article 19 on Freedom of Information in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia

15 APRIL 2005
CASE STUDY: Teaching Institute or Dance Bar?

Putting Local Freedom of Information Legislation to Use in Argentina

7 APRIL 2005
CASE STUDY: FOIA Law Discloses British Farm Subsidies

9 FEBRUARY 2005
CASE STUDY: On-line networking solves potential secrecy problem in Slovakia - elapsed time four hours

30 JUNE 2004
CASE STUDY: The Right to Know is the Right to Live

Profile of a Remarkable Peoples' Movement in India that Links Information to Livelihood

16 JUNE 2004 - UPDATE
CASE STUDY: Bulgaria - The Access to Information Program
Fighting for Transparency during the Democratic Transition

13 APRIL 2004
CASE STUDY: The Transparency Labyrinth in Argentina

14 OCTOBER 2003
CASE STUDY: The Freedom of Information Campaign in Argentina

11 OCTOBER 2003
"The right to know is gaining around the world"
by Thomas Blanton
The International Herald Tribune

5 OCTOBER 2003
REPORT: Fiji Debates Freedom of Information Proposal
Citizens' Group Launches Draft Law

22 SEPTEMBER 2003
REPORT: Freedom of Information in Ireland
Five Years On

8 SEPTEMBER 2003
REPORT: The Birth of the Freedom of Information Act in Japan
Kanagawa 1982

17 JANUARY 2003
CASE STUDY: The Philippines
A Liberal Information Regime Even Without an Information Law

30 SEPTEMBER 2002
CASE STUDY: Secrecy and Openness in the European Union
The Ongoing Struggle for Freedom of Information

27 JULY 2002
CASE STUDY: Japan - Breaking Down the Walls of Secrecy
The Story of the Citizen's Movement for an Information Disclosure Law

17 JULY 2002
REPORT: A Landmark Law Opens Up Post-Apartheid South Africa

9 JULY 2002
REPORT: In Mexico, a New Law Guarantees the Right to Know

5 JULY 2002
ANALYSIS: Japanese Government Information:
New Rules for Access

The 2001 Information Disclosure Law, and a Comparison with the U.S. FOIA

JULY/AUGUST 2002
The World's Right to Know
By Thomas Blanton
Published in Foreign Policy


|
|
|
|
|
|
Suite 701, Gelman Library, 2130 H Street, NW, Washington, D.C., 20037 - email@freedominfo.org
Copyright © 2006-2008 freedominfo.org