about | countries | foi news | features | ifti | links
stay informed!
Join freedominfo.org's
email update list


home > features > foi in ireland

22 SEPTEMBER 2003
REPORT: Freedom of Information in Ireland: Five Years On

The leading freedom of information expert in Ireland, Maeve McDonagh of University College Cork, reviews the first five years of the Irish law, passed in 1997 and implemented in 1998, and deconstructs the latest amendments, from April 2003, that roll back parts of the law. In addition to a penetrating analysis of the statute, Professor McDonagh provides striking examples of public disclosures resulting from Ireland’s access to government information.

Download the entire report in Adobe PDF format:
Freedom of Information in Ireland: Five Years On (308 KB)


Freedom of Information in Ireland: Five Years On
By Maeve McDonagh
[Excerpt]

The genesis of the Irish Freedom of Information Act can be traced back to the late 1980s, when allegations of improper relationships between politics and business in Ireland began to surface. (Note 1) One of the chief catalysts to the introduction of the legislation was the establishment of the Beef Tribunal Inquiry in 1991 to investigate allegations of irregularities in the export trade for beef and the possible involvement of politicians in such irregularities. Both houses of the Irish parliament passed resolutions to establish the Tribunal as a result of a major Dail (lower house) debate on an ITV World in Action programme broadcast in mid-1991, which added major television exposure to the many calls for investigating the close relationship between the government and a group of companies operating in the meat trade. Specific allegations revealed by the World in Action programme included the abuse by this group of companies of the EU export refunds scheme.

The Beef Tribunal took over three years to complete its work and has so far cost in the order of €26m. (Note 2) The Tribunal's proceedings showed that greater openness in government could have prevented many of the abuses developing to the extent they had and could also have contributed by obviating the need for a tribunal of inquiry. An oft quoted excerpt from the Tribunal's proceedings is the Chairman's (Note 3) remark that

'if the questions that were asked in the Dail [the Lower House of Parliament] were answered in the way they are answered here, there would be no necessity for this inquiry and an awful lot of time and money would have been saved.'

Access to government information became an important issue in the general election of November 1992. The incoming government promised to 'consider' the introduction of freedom of information legislation. (Note 4) The demise of that government in controversial circumstances then fuelled the demand for greater openness in government. The then-Attorney-General, Mr Harry Whelehan, had been appointed by the Government as President of the High Court although his office had been the subject of severe criticism as a result of delays in the extradition to Northern Ireland of a priest who was suspected of child abuse. Among other deficiencies, Mr. Whelehan's office had failed to release information with regard to the processing of the extradition application. Widespread public comment on the appointment of Mr Whelehan as President of the High Court remarked on the variance with the government's frequently expressed pledge to deliver openness, accountability and transparency. The refusal of the Taoiseach (Prime Minister) to back down on this appointment ultimately led to his own resignation and to the fall of the government. The manifest of the incoming coalition in December 1994 finally set out a firm commitment to the introduction of freedom of information legislation.

While at one level the introduction of freedom of information legislation in Ireland can be viewed as a response to the demand of the electorate for greater openness, it also formed part of a wider and longer-term programme of public service and Oireachtas (parliamentary) reform. (Note 5) The genesis of these reforms can be traced back to developments in public sector reform internationally particularly in the UK, Canada and New Zealand.

As part of the process of developing the legislative proposal, the sponsoring Minister (Note 6) and a team of senior civil servants undertook a research tour of Australia and New Zealand to study the operation of Freedom of Information legislation in those jurisdictions. The influence of Australian legislation, in particular, is evident in the finished product. There was a delay of some two years between the announcement of the promise to introduce freedom of information legislation and the publication of the bill in December 1996. This delay is partly explained by the complexity of the legislation. Another reason for the Bill's long gestation was the extensive process of consultation undertaken with government departments, not all of whom would appear to have been wholehearted in their support of the proposals. The opposition of the Department of Justice to the legislation was particularly strong and the legislation bears the marks of its lack of enthusiasm for FOI. Despite comprehensive consultation within the public sector, there was very little debate surrounding the detailed contents of the Bill in the wider public arena. The Freedom of Information Act became law on 21st April 1997 and entered into force on 21st April 1998.

Download the entire report in Adobe PDF format:
Freedom of Information in Ireland: Five Years On (308 KB)


Notes

1. The Beef Tribunal was established in 1991 to enquire into allegations of improper practices within the beef industry in particular.

2. Some costs issues are still outstanding.

3. Mr Justice Liam Hamilton.

4. Fianna Fail and Labour Programme for a Partnership Government 1993 - 1997, p.16.

5. A programme of public service reform entitled the Strategic Management Initiative commenced in the early 1990s. This led to the introduction of the Public Service Management Act 1997. Other relevant legislation introduced in the 1990s included the Ethics in Public Office Act 1995, the Committee of the Houses of the Oireachtas (Compellability, Privileges and Immunities of Witnesses) Act 1997 and the Electoral Act 1997.

6. Ms Eithne Fitzgerald T.D.

 

Back to top

University College Cork, Ireland - collection of Ogham Stones (4th - 8th century AD)

FEATURES ARCHIVE

30 JANUARY 2008
JAPAN - Tokyo Court: Foreign Ministry's Failure to Provide Documents on 1965 Japan-Korea Normalization Pact Illegal

9 MAY 2007
China Adopts First Nationwide Open Government Information Regulations

28 SEPTEMBER 2006
International Right to Know Day 2006 - Celebrating Freedom of Information Around the World

12 JULY 2006
REPORT: UNDP Seminar Spotlights Complexity of Expanding Right to Know

27 JUNE 2006     
CASE STUDY: Two Steps Forward, One Step Backwards: The Access to Information Campaign in Argentina

22 MARCH 2006     
Freedom of Information Laws Added to the Development Agenda

22 MARCH 2006
freedominfo.org Kicks Off Legislative Transparency Project

16 NOVEMBER 2005
ANALYSIS: How to Measure Openness?
Towards an International Index

28 SEPTEMBER 2005
Freedom of Information Makes Headlines Around the World
International Right to Know Day 2005

9 MAY 2005
REPORT: Article 19 on Freedom of Information in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia

15 APRIL 2005
CASE STUDY: Teaching Institute or Dance Bar?

Putting Local Freedom of Information Legislation to Use in Argentina

7 APRIL 2005
CASE STUDY: FOIA Law Discloses British Farm Subsidies

9 FEBRUARY 2005
CASE STUDY: On-line networking solves potential secrecy problem in Slovakia - elapsed time four hours

30 JUNE 2004
CASE STUDY: The Right to Know is the Right to Live

Profile of a Remarkable Peoples' Movement in India that Links Information to Livelihood

16 JUNE 2004 - UPDATE
CASE STUDY: Bulgaria - The Access to Information Program
Fighting for Transparency during the Democratic Transition

13 APRIL 2004
CASE STUDY: The Transparency Labyrinth in Argentina

14 OCTOBER 2003
CASE STUDY: The Freedom of Information Campaign in Argentina

11 OCTOBER 2003
"The right to know is gaining around the world"
by Thomas Blanton
The International Herald Tribune

5 OCTOBER 2003
REPORT: Fiji Debates Freedom of Information Proposal
Citizens' Group Launches Draft Law

22 SEPTEMBER 2003
REPORT: Freedom of Information in Ireland
Five Years On

8 SEPTEMBER 2003
REPORT: The Birth of the Freedom of Information Act in Japan
Kanagawa 1982

17 JANUARY 2003
CASE STUDY: The Philippines
A Liberal Information Regime Even Without an Information Law

30 SEPTEMBER 2002
CASE STUDY: Secrecy and Openness in the European Union
The Ongoing Struggle for Freedom of Information

27 JULY 2002
CASE STUDY: Japan - Breaking Down the Walls of Secrecy
The Story of the Citizen's Movement for an Information Disclosure Law

17 JULY 2002
REPORT: A Landmark Law Opens Up Post-Apartheid South Africa

9 JULY 2002
REPORT: In Mexico, a New Law Guarantees the Right to Know

5 JULY 2002
ANALYSIS: Japanese Government Information:
New Rules for Access

The 2001 Information Disclosure Law, and a Comparison with the U.S. FOIA

JULY/AUGUST 2002
The World's Right to Know
By Thomas Blanton
Published in Foreign Policy


|
|
|
|
|
|
Suite 701, Gelman Library, 2130 H Street, NW, Washington, D.C., 20037 - email@freedominfo.org
Copyright © 2006-2008 freedominfo.org